home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.netspace.net.au!usenet
- From: astroboy@netspace.net.au (Paul Dossett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: Speed: 68040 vs. 68060
- Date: 29 Feb 1996 04:55:09 GMT
- Organization: NetSpace Online Systems
- Message-ID: <1080.6631T1100T429@netspace.net.au>
- References: <4foi00$60t@gondor.sdsu.edu> <3125E74D.3390@gih.no> <19960223.425E10.10CBD@an100.du.pipex.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-a1-1.mel.netspace.net.au
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- Mathew Hendry (m.hendry@dial.pipex.com) said:
- >Lee Huggett (Lee@burst.demon.co.uk) wrote:
- >: > Full bullshit. I complied a simple real-world test,
- >: > and it was about 2x fast as on my 040/40 Warp Engine,
- >: > and about a same on P90.
- >:
- >: Hey Hey Hey don't start getting fucking nasty...
- >:
- >: What simple real world test??
- >:
- >: Mail it to me and I'll give it a try...
-
- >Try the BYTEMark tests on Aminet, which contain compiled algorithms designed
- >to simulate real world applications. They are scaled to performance - faster
- >CPUs are given bigger tasks. The results are benchmarked relative to a Dell
- >P90, which was quite humbling for my poor Amiga and its aging 40MHz '030 :(
- >(approx. 10% of a P90 for integer routines, BTW. Even slower for FP)
-
- The NBench.040.881 program crashed for me. I wonder why? I certainly *do*
- have an FPU in my 040.
-
-
- --
- Paul Dossett | EpiphoneYamahaPearlPaiste | Amiga 2000/040/17/365/3.1 __
- -------------| Amiga owner since 1988! | Amiga CD32/020/10/200/3.1__///
- Melbourne OZ | astroboy@netspace.net.au | 1976 Toyota Corolla 1.2 \XX/
-
-